Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 18 de 18
Filter
1.
mBio ; : e0351721, 2022 Jan 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2256602

ABSTRACT

Acinetobacter baumannii causes high mortality in ventilator-associated pneumonia patients, and antibiotic treatment is compromised by multidrug-resistant strains resistant to ß-lactams, carbapenems, cephalosporins, polymyxins, and tetracyclines. Among COVID-19 patients receiving ventilator support, a multidrug-resistant A. baumannii secondary infection is associated with a 2-fold increase in mortality. Here, we investigated the use of the 8-hydroxyquinoline ionophore PBT2 to break the resistance of A. baumannii to tetracycline class antibiotics. In vitro, the combination of PBT2 and zinc with either tetracycline, doxycycline, or tigecycline was shown to be bactericidal against multidrug-resistant A. baumannii, and any resistance that did arise imposed a fitness cost. PBT2 and zinc disrupted metal ion homeostasis in A. baumannii, increasing cellular zinc and copper while decreasing magnesium accumulation. Using a murine model of pulmonary infection, treatment with PBT2 in combination with tetracycline or tigecycline proved efficacious against multidrug-resistant A. baumannii. These findings suggest that PBT2 may find utility as a resistance breaker to rescue the efficacy of tetracycline-class antibiotics commonly employed to treat multidrug-resistant A. baumannii infections. IMPORTANCE Within intensive care unit settings, multidrug-resistant (MDR) Acinetobacter baumannii is a major cause of ventilator-associated pneumonia, and hospital-associated outbreaks are becoming increasingly widespread. Antibiotic treatment of A. baumannii infection is often compromised by MDR strains resistant to last-resort ß-lactam (e.g., carbapenems), polymyxin, and tetracycline class antibiotics. During the on-going COVID-19 pandemic, secondary bacterial infection by A. baumannii has been associated with a 2-fold increase in COVID-19-related mortality. With a rise in antibiotic resistance and a reduction in new antibiotic discovery, it is imperative to investigate alternative therapeutic regimens that complement the use of current antibiotic treatment strategies. Rescuing the efficacy of existing therapies for the treatment of MDR A. baumannii infection represents a financially viable pathway, reducing time, cost, and risk associated with drug innovation.

2.
Trials ; 23(1): 1014, 2022 Dec 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2162410

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: SARS-CoV-2 infection is associated with a significant risk of hospitalisation, death, and prolonged impact on quality of life. Evaluation of new treatment options and optimising therapeutic management of people hospitalised with SARS-CoV-2 infection remains essential, but rapid changes in pandemic conditions and potential therapies have limited the utility of traditional approaches to randomised controlled trials. METHODS: ASCOT ADAPT is an international, investigator-initiated, adaptive platform, randomised controlled trial of therapeutics for non-critically ill patients hospitalised with COVID-19. The study design is open label and pragmatic. Potential participants are hospitalised adults with PCR confirmed, symptomatic, SARS-CoV-2 infection, within 14 days of symptom onset. Domains include antiviral, antibody and anticoagulant interventions, with a composite primary outcome of 28-day mortality or progression to intensive-care level respiratory or haemodynamic support. Initial interventions include intravenous nafamostat and variable dose anticoagulation. A range of secondary endpoints, and substudies for specific domains and interventions are outlined. DISCUSSION: This paper presents the trial protocol and management structure, including international governance, remote site monitoring and biobanking activities and provides commentary on ethical and pragmatic considerations in establishing the ASCOT ADAPT trial under pandemic conditions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12620000445976) and ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04483960).


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Adult , Humans , SARS-CoV-2 , Quality of Life , Biological Specimen Banks , Australia , Treatment Outcome
3.
McQuilten, Zoe, Venkatesh, Balasubramanian, Jha, Vivekanand, Roberts, Jason, Morpeth, Susan, Totterdell, James, McPhee, Grace, Abraham, John, Bam, Niraj, Bandara, Methma, Bangi, Ashpak, Barina, Lauren, Basnet, Bhupendra, Bhally, Hasan, Bhusal, Khemr, Bogati, Umesh, Bowen, Asha, Burke, Andrew, Christopher, Devasahayam, Chunilal, Sanjeev, Cochrane, Belinda, Curnow, Jennifer, Dara Reddy, Varaprasad Babu, Das, Santa, Dhungana, Ashesh, Di Tanna, Gian Luca, Dotel, Ravindra, Dsouza, Hyjel, Dummer, Jack, Dutta, Sourabh, Foo, Hong, Gilbey, Timothy, Giles, Michelle, Goli, Kasiram, Gordon, Adrienne, Gyanwali, Pradip, Hudson, Bernard, Jani, Manoj, Jevaji, Purnima, Jhawar, Sachin, Jindal, Aikaj, John, M. Joseph, John, Mary, John, Flavita, John, Oommen, Jones, Mark, Joshi, Rajesh, Kamath, Prashanthi, Kang, Gagandeep, Karki, Achyut, Karmalkar, Abhishek, Kaur, Baldeep, Koganti, Kalyan Chakravarthy, Koshy, Jency, Mathew, S. K.; Lau, Jilllian, Lewin, Sharon, Lim, Lyn-li, Marschner, Ian, Marsh, Julie, Maze, Michael, McGree, James, McMahon, James, Medcalf, Robert, Merriman, Eileen, Misal, Amol, Mora, Jocelyn, Mudaliar, Vijaybabu, Nguyen, Vi, O'Sullivan, Matthew, Pant, Suman, Pant, Pankaj, Paterson, David, Price, David, Rees, Megan, Robinson, James Owen, Rogers, Benjamin, Samuel, Sandhya, Sasadeusz, Joe, Sharma, Deepak, Sharma, Prabhat, Shrestha, Roshan, Shrestha, Sailesh, Shrestha, Prajowl, Shukla, Urvi, Shum, Omar, Sommerville, Christine, Spelman, Tim, Sullivan, Richard, Thatavarthi, Umashankar, Tran, Huyen, Trask, Nanette, Whitehead, Claire, Mahar, Robert, Hammond, Naomi, McFadyen, James David, Snelling, Thomas, Davis, Joshua, Denholm, Justin, Tong, Steven Y. C..
Blood ; 140:326-328, 2022.
Article in English | ScienceDirect | ID: covidwho-2120231
4.
Clin Pharmacokinet ; 61(10): 1331-1343, 2022 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2075730

ABSTRACT

The search for clinically effective antivirals against the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) is ongoing. Repurposing of drugs licensed for non-coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) indications has been extensively investigated in laboratory models and in clinical studies with mixed results. Nafamostat mesylate (nafamostat) is a drug licensed in Japan and Korea for indications including acute pancreatitis and disseminated intravascular coagulation. It is available only for continuous intravenous infusion. In vitro human lung cell line studies with nafamostat demonstrate high antiviral potency against SARS-CoV-2 (half maximal inhibitory concentration [IC50] of 0.0022 µM [compared to remdesivir 1.3 µM]), ostensibly via inhibition of the cellular enzyme transmembrane protease serine 2 (TMPRSS2) preventing viral entry into human cells. In addition, the established antithrombotic activity is hypothesised to be advantageous given thrombosis-associated sequelae of COVID-19. Clinical reports to date are limited, but indicate a potential benefit of nafamostat in patients with moderate to severe COVID-19. In this review, we will explore the pre-clinical, pharmacokinetic and clinical outcome data presently available for nafamostat as a treatment for COVID-19. The recruitment to ongoing clinical trials is a priority to provide more robust data on the safety and efficacy of nafamostat as a treatment for COVID-19.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Drug Treatment , Pancreatitis , Acute Disease , Antiviral Agents/pharmacology , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Benzamidines , Fibrinolytic Agents/therapeutic use , Guanidines , Humans , Pancreatitis/drug therapy , SARS-CoV-2 , Serine/therapeutic use
5.
Journal of pharmacy practice and research : official journal of the Society of Hospital Pharmacists of Australia ; 52(1):1-4, 2022.
Article in English | EuropePMC | ID: covidwho-1836932
7.
Intern Med J ; 52(2): 214-222, 2022 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1700926

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has generated significant debate about how emerging infections can be treated in the absence of evidence-based therapies to combat disease. In particular, the use of off-label therapies outside of a clinical trial setting has been controversial. AIM: To longitudinally study policies and prescribing practices pertaining to therapies for COVID-19 in Australian health services during 2020. METHODS: Prospective data were collected from participating Australian health services who may care for patients with COVID-19 via an electronic portal. A single informant from each health service was emailed a survey link at regular intervals. Information was sought regarding changes to COVID-19 policy at their service and use of therapies for COVID-19. RESULTS: Overall, 78 hospitals were represented from 39 respondents with longitudinal data collection from May to December 2020. All Australian states/territories were represented with the majority (34/39; 87%) of respondents located in a major city. Just over half (20/39) of respondents had a written policy for COVID-19 therapy use at their health service at survey enrolment and policies changed frequently throughout the pandemic. Therapy use outside of a clinical trial was reported in 54% of health services, most frequently in Victoria, correlating with higher numbers of COVID-19 cases. At study commencement, hydroxychloroquine was most frequently used, with corticosteroids and remdesivir use increasingly throughout the study period. CONCLUSION: Our results reflect the reactive nature of prescribing of therapies for COVID-19 and highlight the importance of evidence-based guidelines to assist prescribers.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Australia/epidemiology , Health Services , Humans , Pandemics , Policy , Prospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Surveys and Questionnaires
10.
Angewandte Chemie ; 133(31):17239-17244, 2021.
Article in English | ProQuest Central | ID: covidwho-1315247

ABSTRACT

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) has resulted in an unprecedented need for diagnostic testing that is critical in controlling the spread of COVID‐19. We propose a portable infrared spectrometer with purpose‐built transflection accessory for rapid point‐of‐care detection of COVID‐19 markers in saliva. Initially, purified virion particles were characterized with Raman spectroscopy, synchrotron infrared (IR) and AFM‐IR. A data set comprising 171 transflection infrared spectra from 29 subjects testing positive for SARS‐CoV‐2 by RT‐qPCR and 28 testing negative, was modeled using Monte Carlo Double Cross Validation with 50 randomized test and model sets. The testing sensitivity was 93 % (27/29) with a specificity of 82 % (23/28) that included positive samples on the limit of detection for RT‐qPCR. Herein, we demonstrate a proof‐of‐concept high throughput infrared COVID‐19 test that is rapid, inexpensive, portable and utilizes sample self‐collection thus minimizing the risk to healthcare workers and ideally suited to mass screening.

11.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 100(22): e26253, 2021 Jun 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1258821

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT: Pathophysiological changes are important risk factors for critically ill patients with pneumonia manifesting sub-therapeutic antibiotic exposures during empirical treatment. The effect of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on antibiotic dosing requirements is uncertain. We aimed to determine the effect of COVID-19 on ß-lactam pharmacokinetics (PK) and PK target attainment in critically ill patients with a personalized dosing strategy.Retrospective, single-center analysis of COVID-19 ± critically ill patients with pneumonia (community-acquired pneumonia or hospital-acquired pneumonia) who received continuous infusion of a ß-lactam antibiotic with dosing personalized through dosing software and therapeutic drug monitoring. A therapeutic exposure was defined as serum concentration between (css) 4 to 8 times the EUCAST non-species related breakpoint).Data from 58 patients with pneumonia was analyzed. Nineteen patients were tested COVID-19-positive before the start of the antibiotic therapy for community-acquired pneumonia or hospital-acquired pneumonia. Therapeutic exposure was achieved in 71% of COVID-19 patients (68% considering all patients). All patients demonstrated css above the non-species-related breakpoint. Twenty percent exceeded css above the target range (24% of all patients). The median ß-lactam clearance was 49% compared to ß-lactam clearance in a standard patient without a significant difference regarding antibiotic, time of sampling or present COVID-19 infection. Median daily doses were 50% lower compared to standard bolus dosing.COVID-19 did not significantly affect ß-lactam pharmacokinetics in critically ill patients. Personalized ß-lactam dosing strategies were safe in critically ill patients and lead to high PK target attainment with less resources.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Drug Treatment , beta-Lactams/administration & dosage , beta-Lactams/pharmacokinetics , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Body Mass Index , Critical Illness , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Drug Monitoring , Female , Humans , Infusions, Intravenous , Male , Metabolic Clearance Rate , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Severity of Illness Index , beta-Lactams/economics , beta-Lactams/therapeutic use
12.
Angew Chem Int Ed Engl ; 60(31): 17102-17107, 2021 07 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1245354

ABSTRACT

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has resulted in an unprecedented need for diagnostic testing that is critical in controlling the spread of COVID-19. We propose a portable infrared spectrometer with purpose-built transflection accessory for rapid point-of-care detection of COVID-19 markers in saliva. Initially, purified virion particles were characterized with Raman spectroscopy, synchrotron infrared (IR) and AFM-IR. A data set comprising 171 transflection infrared spectra from 29 subjects testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 by RT-qPCR and 28 testing negative, was modeled using Monte Carlo Double Cross Validation with 50 randomized test and model sets. The testing sensitivity was 93 % (27/29) with a specificity of 82 % (23/28) that included positive samples on the limit of detection for RT-qPCR. Herein, we demonstrate a proof-of-concept high throughput infrared COVID-19 test that is rapid, inexpensive, portable and utilizes sample self-collection thus minimizing the risk to healthcare workers and ideally suited to mass screening.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Testing/methods , COVID-19/diagnosis , Saliva/chemistry , Animals , Chlorocebus aethiops , Cohort Studies , Discriminant Analysis , Humans , Least-Squares Analysis , Monte Carlo Method , Point-of-Care Testing , Proof of Concept Study , SARS-CoV-2 , Sensitivity and Specificity , Specimen Handling , Spectrophotometry, Infrared , Vero Cells
13.
Clin Pharmacokinet ; 59(10): 1195-1216, 2020 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-679744

ABSTRACT

There is an urgent need to identify optimal antiviral therapies for COVID-19 caused by SARS-CoV-2. We have conducted a rapid and comprehensive review of relevant pharmacological evidence, focusing on (1) the pharmacokinetics (PK) of potential antiviral therapies; (2) coronavirus-specific pharmacodynamics (PD); (3) PK and PD interactions between proposed combination therapies; (4) pharmacology of major supportive therapies; and (5) anticipated drug-drug interactions (DDIs). We found promising in vitro evidence for remdesivir, (hydroxy)chloroquine and favipiravir against SARS-CoV-2; potential clinical benefit in SARS-CoV-2 with remdesivir, the combination of lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) plus ribavirin; and strong evidence for LPV/r plus ribavirin against Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) for post-exposure prophylaxis in healthcare workers. Despite these emerging data, robust controlled clinical trials assessing patient-centred outcomes remain imperative and clinical data have already reduced expectations with regard to some drugs. Any therapy should be used with caution in the light of potential drug interactions and the uncertainty of optimal doses for treating mild versus serious infections.


Subject(s)
Antiviral Agents/pharmacology , Coronavirus Infections/drug therapy , Pneumonia, Viral/drug therapy , Analgesics/pharmacology , Anticoagulants/pharmacology , Antiviral Agents/pharmacokinetics , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/physiopathology , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Drug Interactions , Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation/methods , Humans , Hypnotics and Sedatives/pharmacology , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/physiopathology , Renal Replacement Therapy/methods , SARS-CoV-2 , Therapeutic Index, Drug
14.
Trials ; 21(1): 646, 2020 Jul 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-670196

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To determine if lopinavir/ritonavir +/- hydroxychloroquine will reduce the proportion of participants who survive without requiring ventilatory support, 15 days after enrolment, in adult participants with non-critically ill SARS-CoV-2 infection. TRIAL DESIGN: ASCOT is an investigator-initiated, multi-centre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Participants will have been hospitalised with confirmed COVID-19, and will be randomised 1:1:1:1 to receive lopinavir /ritonavir, hydroxychloroquine, both or neither drug in addition to standard of care management. PARTICIPANTS: Participants will be recruited from >80 hospitals across Australia and New Zealand, representing metropolitan and regional centres in both public and private sectors. Admitted patients will be eligible if aged ≥ 18 years, have confirmed SARS-CoV-2 by nucleic acid testing in the past 12 days and are expected to remain an inpatient for at least 48 hours from the time of randomisation. Potentially eligible participants will be excluded if admitted to intensive care or requiring high level respiratory support, are currently receiving study drugs or their use is contraindicated due to allergy, drug interaction or comorbidities (including baseline QTc prolongation of 470ms for women or 480ms for men), or death is anticipated imminently. INTERVENTION AND COMPARATOR: Participants will be randomised 1:1:1:1 to: Group 1: standard of care; Group 2: lopinavir (400mg) / ritonavir (100mg) twice daily for 10 days in tablet form; Group 3: hydroxychloroquine (800mg) 4x200mg administered 12 hours apart on Day 1, followed by 400mg twice a day for 6 days; Group 4: lopinavir /ritonavir plus hydroxychloroquine. MAIN OUTCOMES: Proportion of participants alive and not having required intensive respiratory support (invasive or non-invasive ventilation) at 15 days after enrolment. A range of clinical and virological secondary outcomes will also be evaluated. RANDOMISATION: The randomisation schedule will be generated by an independent statistician. Randomisation will be stratified by site and will be in permuted blocks of variable block size. The randomised sequence allocation will only be accessible to the data management group, and site investigators will have individual participant allocation provided through a web-based trial enrolment platform. BLINDING (MASKING): This is an open-label study, with researchers assessing the laboratory outcomes blinded to treatment allocation. No unblinding procedures relating to potential adverse effects are therefore required. NUMBERS TO BE RANDOMISED (SAMPLE SIZE): We assumed that 5% of participants receiving standard of care would meet the primary outcome, aimed to evaluate whether interventions could lead to a relative risk of 0.5, assuming no interaction between intervention arms. This corresponds to a required sample size of 610 per arm, with a 5% two-sided significance level (alpha) and 80% power. The total sample size therefore is planned to be 2440. TRIAL STATUS: ASCOT protocol version 3, May 5, 2020. Recruitment opened April 4, 2020 and is ongoing, with planned completion of enrolment July 31, 2021. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ( ACTRN12620000445976 ). Prospectively registered April 6, 2020. FULL PROTOCOL: The full protocol is attached as an additional file, accessible from the Trials website (Additional file 1). In the interest in expediting dissemination of this material, the familiar formatting has been eliminated; this Letter serves as a summary of the key elements of the full protocol.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus , Coronavirus Infections/drug therapy , Hydroxychloroquine/administration & dosage , Lopinavir/administration & dosage , Pneumonia, Viral/drug therapy , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Ritonavir/administration & dosage , Standard of Care , COVID-19 , Drug Therapy, Combination , Hospitalization , Humans , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19 Drug Treatment
16.
Can J Cardiol ; 36(6): 948-951, 2020 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-77139

ABSTRACT

The COVID-19 pandemic has led to efforts at rapid investigation and application of drugs which may improve prognosis but for which safety and efficacy are not yet established. This document attempts to provide reasonable guidance for the use of antimicrobials which have uncertain benefit but may increase risk of QT interval prolongation and ventricular proarrhythmia, notably, chloroquine, hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin, and lopinavir/ritonavir. During the pandemic, efforts to reduce spread and minimize effects on health care resources mandate minimization of unnecessary medical procedures and testing. We recommend that the risk of drug proarrhythmia be minimized by 1) discontinuing unnecessary medications that may also increase the QT interval, 2) identifying outpatients who are likely to be at low risk and do not need further testing (no history of prolonged QT interval, unexplained syncope, or family history of premature sudden cardiac death, no medications that may prolong the QT interval, and/or a previous known normal corrected QT interval [QTc]), and 3) performing baseline testing in hospitalized patients or those who may be at higher risk. If baseline electrocardiographic testing reveals a moderately prolonged QTc, optimization of medications and electrolytes may permit therapy. If the QTc is markedly prolonged, drugs that further prolong it should be avoided, or expert consultation may permit administration with mitigating precautions. These recommendations are made while there are no known effective treatments for COVID-19 and should be revisited when further data on efficacy and safety become available.


Subject(s)
Arrhythmias, Cardiac , Azithromycin/pharmacology , Coronavirus Infections , Hydroxychloroquine/pharmacology , Long QT Syndrome , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral , Risk Management/methods , Ritonavir/pharmacology , Antiviral Agents/pharmacology , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/chemically induced , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/diagnosis , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/prevention & control , Betacoronavirus/isolation & purification , COVID-19 , Canada , Coronavirus Infections/complications , Coronavirus Infections/drug therapy , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Humans , Long QT Syndrome/chemically induced , Long QT Syndrome/diagnosis , Long QT Syndrome/prevention & control , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/drug therapy , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19 Drug Treatment
17.
Med J Aust ; 212(10): 459-462, 2020 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-39583

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To describe the first isolation and sequencing of SARS-CoV-2 in Australia and rapid sharing of the isolate. SETTING: SARS-CoV-2 was isolated from a 58-year-old man from Wuhan, China who arrived in Melbourne on 19 January 2020 and was admitted to the Monash Medical Centre, Melbourne from the emergency department on 24 January 2020 with fever, cough, and progressive dyspnoea. MAJOR OUTCOMES: Clinical course and laboratory features of the first reported case of COVID-19 (the illness caused by SARS-CoV-2) in Australia; isolation, whole genome sequencing, imaging, and rapid sharing of virus from the patient. RESULTS: A nasopharyngeal swab and sputum collected when the patient presented to hospital were each positive for SARS-CoV-2 (reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction). Inoculation of Vero/hSLAM cells with material from the nasopharyngeal swab led to the isolation of SARS-CoV-2 virus in culture. Electron microscopy of the supernatant confirmed the presence of virus particles with morphology characteristic of viruses of the family Coronaviridae. Whole genome sequencing of the viral isolate and phylogenetic analysis indicated the isolate exhibited greater than 99.99% sequence identity with other publicly available SARS-CoV-2 genomes. Within 24 hours of isolation, the first Australian SARS-CoV-2 isolate was shared with local and overseas reference laboratories and major North American and European culture collections. CONCLUSIONS: The ability to rapidly identify, propagate, and internationally share our SARS-CoV-2 isolate is an important step in collaborative scientific efforts to deal effectively with this international public health emergency by developing better diagnostic procedures, vaccine candidates, and antiviral agents.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus/genetics , Coronavirus Infections/genetics , Information Dissemination/methods , Patient Isolation/methods , Pneumonia, Viral/genetics , Australia , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , SARS-CoV-2 , Whole Genome Sequencing
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL